This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
You may have a lean, agile, responsive site design only to find it gradually loaded down with more and more “extras” that are often put onto the site by marketing departments or business leaders who are not always thinking about websiteperformance. You cannot always anticipate what you cannot control. of mobile sites and 94.1%
The only time the Internet was mentioned was as a tool for communicating with one another without the need to chop down more trees, or for working without a commute. So, when people first started talking about the Internet having similar carbon emissions to the airline industry , I was a bit skeptical. More after jump!
Luckily, there are many great options that help you automate the collection of data and measure how your websiteperforms over time according to these metrics. In real-world scenarios, JavaScript seems to perform better than WebAssembly on smaller array sizes and WebAssembly performs better than JavaScript on larger array sizes.
Luckily, there are many great options that help you automate the collection of data and measure how your websiteperforms over time according to these metrics. For most web apps, JavaScript is a better fit, and WebAssembly is best used for computationally intensive web apps, such as web games. Image source ). Browser support?
Luckily, there are many great options that help you automate the collection of data and measure how your websiteperforms over time according to these metrics. In fact, JPEG XL seems to be performing way better across the board. Not to mix up with Microsoft’s JPEG-XR coming from good ol' Internet Explorer 9 times).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content