Remove Document Remove Latency Remove Systems Remove Virtualization
article thumbnail

Who monitors the monitoring systems?

Adrian Cockcroft

Juvenal Photo taken in Lisbon Portugal by Adrian Cockcroft The documentation for most monitoring tools describes how to use that tool in isolation, often as if no other tools exist, but sometimes with ways to import or export some of the data to other tools. What if your monitoring systems fail? “Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?”?—?Juvenal

article thumbnail

Why you should benchmark your database using stored procedures

HammerDB

Stored Procedures and Client SQL comparison To test the stored procedures and client implementations, we ran both workloads against a system equipped with Intel Xeon 8280L. The data shows a scripted automated workload running a number of back to back tests each time with an increasing number of virtual users. On MySQL, we saw a 1.5X

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

SRE Incident Management: Overview, Techniques, and Tools

Dotcom-Montior

Systems, web applications, servers, devices, etc., SREs and DevOps teams can use these incidents to build back better and improve their systems and services. Now that we have talked about what an incident is, incident management is the process by which teams resolve these events and bring systems and services back to normal operation.

article thumbnail

Common Challenges in Continuous Testing

Testsigma

Lack of Testability Support in Products: A test automation system is a very basic requirement for Continuous Testing. Teams often resort to using in-house test automation tools or frameworks which are neither well-documented nor well-maintained. Common Challenges. With in-house tools/frameworks, you have the benefit of code-ownership.

Testing 69
article thumbnail

Azure SQL Managed Instance Performance Considerations

SQL Performance

Organizations are taking advantage of having managed backups, lots of built-in security features, an uptime SLA of 99.99%, and an always up-to-date environment where they are no longer responsible for patching SQL Server or the operating system. Gen4 is still described in the documentation , but this option is mostly unavailable now.

Azure 63
article thumbnail

Testing MySQL 8.0.16 on Skylake with innodb_spin_wait_pause_multiplier

HammerDB

However in the Skylake microarchitecture (you can see a list of CPUs here ) the PAUSE instruction changed and in the documentation it says “the latency of the PAUSE instruction in prior generation microarchitectures is about 10 cycles, whereas in Skylake microarchitecture it has been extended to as many as 140 cycles.”

Testing 48
article thumbnail

HammerDB v4.0 New Features Pt1: TPROC-C & TPROC-H

HammerDB

First of all it has always been clear in the HammerDB documentation that the TPROC-C/TPC-C and TPROC-H/TPC-H workloads have not been ‘real’ audited and published TPC results instead providing a tool to run workloads based on these specifications. I.e. if system A generated 1.5X

C++ 40