This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
For more background on safety and security issues related to C++, including definitions of language safety and software security and similar terms, see my March 2024 essay C++ safety, in context. This is a status update on improvements currently in progress for hardening and securing our C++ software. Its just a metaphor.
When I started working on the new edition of Head First C# back in 2023, AI tools like ChatGPT and Copilot were already changing how developers write and learn code. But the audience for the booka developer learning C# as their first, second, or third languagedoesnt yet have these skills. It was clear that I needed to cover them.
Any time you run a test with WebPageTest, you’ll get this table of different milestones and metrics. Note the bottom row shows me the Standard Deviation of the tests’ results. The whole point of the exercise that follows is to allow me to move quickly, spotting patterns from afar, and not having to do any slow or meticulous work yet.
Saving several hours preparing and doing a design review will cost hundreds (if not thousands of hours) of fixing issues down the road.nn> unit testsnnI don’t believe that I have to say that in 2021, but I have never seen a quality product without unit tests. We live in a time when everybody is irked by manual testing.
OReilly author Andrew Stellman recommends several exercises for learning to use AI effectively. A good next step is asking an AI assistant to generate unit tests, either for existing code or some new code (which leads to test-driven development). We already know how to build some evaluation suites that test AIs reliability.
Don’t assume that applications are free of vulnerabilities because your organization has tooling — such as application security testing — and processes in place. How should C-level executives and boards of directors prepare for the SEC cybersecurity mandate?
Basis path testing in software testing is a white box method where the tester examines the codebase to identify all possible paths that could be taken by the user to achieve their aims. These paths are then written as test cases to ensure all the different identified scenarios in the main branches are covered.
Safety and simplicity are the two core things I want to try to dramatically improve in C++, and are why I’m doing my cppfront experiment, so although the above absorbed some time away from cppfront coding it all contributes to the same goal. (If Support all C++23 and draft C++26 headers that have feature test flags.
C++ “move” semantics are simple, and unchanged since C++11. Move: What it is, and how to use it In C++, copying or moving from an object a to an object b sets b to a ’s original value. This post is an attempt to shed light on that situation. That’s it for what advanced users need to know. Yes, but don’t.
I’ll do my testing in tempdb, enabling I/O and time statistics: SET NOCOUNT ON ; USE tempdb ; SET STATISTICS TIME , IO ON ; Limitations of earlier ideas. Use the following code to test the function with the variable assignment technique: DECLARE @n AS BIGINT ; SELECT @n = n FROM dbo. Well, he did , and it’s fascinating!
Simple, mathematically safe, and efficient chained comparisons ( commit ) P0515 “Consistent comparison” (aka “spaceship”) was the first feature derived from this Cpp2 work to be adopted into the ISO Standard for C++, in C++20. Thank you again to everyone who helped land this Cpp2 feature in the ISO C++ Standard.
C++20 supports two main assertion facilities… For each one, briefly summarize how it works, when it is evaluated, and whether it is possible for the programmer to specify a message to be displayed if the assertion fails. 5] For conditions, it’s up to us to make sure it’s true.) see question 4) if NDEBUG is not set. Bonus: [[assert: ?
Briefly, what is the difference among: (a) undefined behavior Undefined behavior is what happens when your program tries to do something whose meaning is not defined at all in the C++ standard language or library (illegal code and/or data). its results if call sites call it in a way that violates the precondition the assertion is testing.
That’s true whether we’re enabling checking at test time (e.g., Some conditions are so expensive that we may never check them without a good reason, even in testing. The first place to look for the bug is in this same function, because if prior contracts were well tested then likely this function created the first unexpected state.
The scenario Service considerations In this exercise, we wanted to perform a major version upgrade from PostgreSQL v12.16 p 5432 -S slot_logical_upgrade -R -c fast -Xs -P -D /data/PG12_new -C 32610/32610 kB (100%), 1/1 tablespace 8. to PostgreSQL v15.4. Create a REPLICATION SLOT Create a replication slot to capture changes.
Customers AS C WHERE EXISTS ( SELECT * FROM Sales. custid = C. For example, when the inner query joins tables with common column names, like in the following example: SELECT custid , companyname , orderdate , orderid , rownum FROM ( SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER ( ) OVER ( PARTITION BY C. Orders AS O ON C.
This can be changed later using the pg_checksums utility, but that will be a painful exercise on a big database. psql "host=localhost user=postgres options='-c synchronous_commit=off'" psql (14.8) Here is an example of the function definition to test the function-level settings. Type "help" for help.
This ruling in itself raises many questions: how much creativity is needed, and is that the same kind of creativity that an artist exercises with a paintbrush? I can also ask for a reading list about plagues in 16th century England, algorithms for testing prime numbers, or anything else. We have provenance.
The way we measure this is through a ‘performance profile’ This simply means that we run a series of tests incrementally increasing the system load until we find the peak performance. Plotting these data points enables us to understand the scalability of the database software being tested on that system. and MySQL 8.0.25
Customers AS C WHERE EXISTS ( SELECT * FROM Sales. custid = C. For example, when the inner query joins tables with common column names, like in the following example: SELECT custid , companyname , orderdate , orderid , rownum FROM ( SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER ( ) OVER ( PARTITION BY C. Orders AS O ON C.
Saga analyzers Sagas have a powerful API, but it’s limited by the confines of C#. You can create a class that is a lousy saga but is still perfectly valid C# code. Saga scenario testing While we were making it easier to write sagas, we thought it was also essential to make it easier to test them. In NServiceBus version 7.7,
Some of these are exercised by the “wrong order” permutations above, but even call sites that remember the right argument order can make mistakes about the actual values. But is (b) always better than (c), in other examples? c) A pointer that is not null void f( int* p ) [[pre( p != Consider using a class instead.
Instead, focus on understanding what the workloads exercise to help us determine how to best use them to aid our performance assessment. Therefore, before we attempt to measure our database performance, we should know the system or cloud instance to be tested in detail. We will not concern ourselves with the raw throughput of workload.
Development is fast and straightforward using standard object-oriented techniques, and the test/debug cycle is kept short by making use of a mock environment running on the developer’s workstation. They make use of standard object-oriented concepts and languages (such as C#, Java, and JavaScript). What Are Real-Time Digital Twins?
Development is fast and straightforward using standard object-oriented techniques, and the test/debug cycle is kept short by making use of a mock environment running on the developer’s workstation. They make use of standard object-oriented concepts and languages (such as C#, Java, and JavaScript). What Are Real-Time Digital Twins?
A value-generative investment is an exercise in deploying risk capital through IT in the pursuit of extraordinary benefit that yields competitive advantage. But many a C-level exec has been fired for cost overruns on utility investments. This does not describe legacy modernization.
The obvious conclusions are (a) every individual drives to the collective output of the team; (b) every individual must strive to perform a high state of excellence; and (c) a team cannot maintain a level of performance any higher than the level of excellence achieved by its weakest performing member.
If you change something and re-run the same test the difference in the results can be attributed to the changes you made. Consequently over time you have a reference point “set in stone” from which future changes can be measured by running the same test. Scalability. can you be sure that it scales?
512 byte response (use database context xxxxxx, default language xxxxxxx, test size xxxxx). – -c the control file. The following is a simple query for looking at the rate of login and logouts the test is accomplishing. The following is a simple query for looking at the rate of login and logouts the test is accomplishing.
The exercise seemed simple enough — just fix one item in the Colfax code and we should be finished. Tests on one TACC development node gave slightly higher results — 2148 GFLOPS to 2254 GFLOPS (average = 2235 GFLOPS), for a set of 180 trials of a DGEMM test with M=N=K=8000 and using all 68 cores.
There was no deep goal — just a desire to see the maximum GFLOPS in action. The exercise seemed simple enough — just fix one item in the Colfax code and we should be finished. Single-core testing with the same DGEMM routine showed maximum values of just under 72% of the nominal peak (about 90% of “adjusted peak”).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content