HammerDB

JULY 6, 2024

This is a brief post to highlight the metrics to use to do the comparison using a separate hardware platform for illustration purposes. per sec, multiplied by 60 gives us 489,754 TPM (transactions per minute) and is the figure we can use for comparison as can be seen from the HammerDB transaction output giving the same data.

C++ 52

C++ Hardware Benchmarking Virtualization 52

SQL Performance

AUGUST 27, 2019

The initial reviews and benchmarks for these processors have been very impressive: AMD EPYC 7002 Series Rome Delivers a Knockout. AMD Rome Second Generation EPYC Review: 2x 64-core Benchmarked. TPC-H Benchmark Results with SQL Server 2017. TPC-E Benchmark Results with SQL Server 2017. In this case, 6,716.88/64

Servers 52

Servers Benchmarking Virtualization Architecture 52

Alex Russell

APRIL 29, 2021

As an engineer on a browser team, I'm privy to the blow-by-blow of various performance projects, benchmark fire drills, and the ways performance marketing (deeply) impacts engineering priorities. With each team, benchmarks lost are understood as bugs. All modern browsers are fast, Chromium and Safari/WebKit included.

Media 145

Media Games Education Engineering 145

HammerDB

DECEMBER 9, 2020

NOPM should be considered the primary metric and is the only one that should be used for a cross database comparison. <benchmark> <first_result>TPM</first_result> </benchmark> So why not just print NOPM and report a single metric for TPROC-C as per the official TPC-C workloads? . <benchmark>

C++ 52

C++ Benchmarking Metrics Database 52

Brendan Gregg

SEPTEMBER 25, 2021

CLI tools The Cassandra systems were EC2 virtual machine (Xen) instances. Note that Ubuntu also has a frame to show entry into vDSO (virtual dynamic shared object). As I'm interested in the relative comparison I can just compare the total runtimes (the "real" time) for the same result. us on Centos and 0.68

Speed 52

Speed Java AWS Virtualization 52

Percona

DECEMBER 20, 2018

I found the comparison of InnoDB vs. MyISAM quite interesting, and I’ll use it in this post. We’ll note how some of the Linux parameter settings used OS tuning may vary according to different system types: physical, virtual or cloud. It feels a bit like people are telling me “Why do you use InnoDB? A Look at MyRocks Performance.

Database 41

Database Tuning Performance AWS 41

Brendan Gregg

SEPTEMBER 25, 2021

CLI tools The Cassandra systems were EC2 virtual machine (Xen) instances. Note that Ubuntu also has a frame to show entry into vDSO (virtual dynamic shared object). As I'm interested in the relative comparison I can just compare the total runtimes (the "real" time) for the same result. us on Centos and 0.68 us on Ubuntu.

Speed 40

Speed Java AWS Virtualization 40

ScaleOut Software

MAY 15, 2014

Well, performance comparisons aren’t so easy since the AppFabric license agreement states: “You may not disclose the results of any benchmark tests of the software to any third party without Microsoft’s prior written approval.” It was tempting to write this blog post as a feature comparison between AppFabric and SOSS.

Cache 40

Cache Servers Network Design 40

HammerDB

OCTOBER 12, 2018

For anyone benchmarking MySQL with HammerDB it is important to understand the differences from sysbench workloads as HammerDB is targeted at a testing a different usage model from sysbench. Error in Virtual User 1: mysqlexec/db server: Table 'mysql.proc' doesn't exist. Vuser 1:56 Active Virtual Users configured.

Best Practices 40

Best Practices Scalability Performance C++ 40

Alex Russell

MAY 9, 2022

Treating data as a distribution fundamentally enables comparison and experimentation because it creates a language for describing non-binary shifts. This often happens out of an ad-hoc virtual team that forms in earlier stages but is now formalised and has long-term staffing. Management Attributes #.

Performance 99

Performance Latency Metrics Engineering 99

Scalegrid

JULY 29, 2020

In our final post, we will put them head-to-head in a detailed feature comparison and compare the results of PgBouncer vs. Pgpool-II performance for your PostgreSQL hosting ! PgBouncer provides a virtual database that reports various useful statistics. Throughput Benchmark. PostgreSQL Connection Pooling Series. Administration.

Benchmarking 246

Benchmarking Database Performance Testing Availability 246

Rigor

FEBRUARY 19, 2020

For example, here is what a comparison report looks like in Rigor. Is it a physical system or virtual? If virtualized, what is the technology used (VM, Docker, software package)? Competitive & Industry Benchmarking. Benchmarking your performance against your competitors and industries.

Monitoring 59

Monitoring Benchmarking Testing Mobile 59

SQL Server According to Bob

JANUARY 11, 2020

​​ The following table outlines the virtual protection states. Page State Virtual Protection State Dirty Read Write ​​ during the modification. Page State Virtual Protection State Dirty Read Write ​​ during the modification.

Servers 40

Servers Cache Database Media 40

Smashing Magazine

JANUARY 11, 2021

Alternatively, you can also use: Addy Osmani’s Chrome UX Report Compare Tool , Speed Scorecard (also provides a revenue impact estimator), Real User Experience Test Comparison or SiteSpeed CI (based on synthetic testing). Geekbench CPU performance benchmarks for the highest selling smartphones globally in 2019. compared to early 2015.

Performance 145

Performance Cache Media Metrics 145