This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
MySQL Azure Performance Benchmark. In this benchmark report, we compare MySQL hosting on Azure at ScaleGrid vs. Azure Database for MySQL across these three workload scenarios: Read-Intensive Workload: 80% reads and 20% writes. Benchmark configurations. Just getting started? MySQL Read-Intensive Performance.
RabbitMQ is designed for flexible routing and message reliability, while Kafka handles high-throughput event streaming and real-time data processing. Its design prioritizes high availability and efficient data transfer with minimal overhead, making it a practical choice for handling real-time data pipelines and distributed event processing.
We have run these benchmarks on the AWS EC2 instances and designed a custom dataset to make it as close as possible to real application use cases. This level of comparison detail will assist decision-makers with the information they would need to make a more appropriate choice of an in-memory data store for their needs.
Performance Benchmarking of PostgreSQL on ScaleGrid vs. AWS RDS Using Sysbench This article evaluates PostgreSQL’s performance on ScaleGrid and AWS RDS, focusing on versions 13, 14, and 15. This study benchmarks PostgreSQL performance across two leading managed database platforms—ScaleGrid and AWS RDS—using versions 13, 14, and 15.
This begins not only in designing the algorithm or coming out with efficient and robust architecture but right onto the choice of programming language. One, by researching on the Internet; Two, by developing small programs and benchmarking. Most of us, as we spend years in our jobs — tend to be proficient in at least one of these.
When designing an architecture, many components need to be considered before deciding on the best solution. Unless a serious refactoring, MySQL Router is designed for very limited scalability, as such, the only way to adopt it is to have many of them at the application node level. MySQL Router was never in the game.
Figure 1: Comparison of widest CPUs in 2015 and 2025. Researchers have also explored hybrid designs that integrate in-order principles into out-of-order pipelines [ FXA , Ballerino ]. This problem is becoming increasingly serious, especially as CPU designs continue to scale up, a trend mentioned earlier.
What Web Designers Can Do To Speed Up Mobile Websites. What Web Designers Can Do To Speed Up Mobile Websites. I recently wrote a blog post for a web designer client about page speed and why it matters. However, their focus has always been on making a great-looking and effective design. Suzanne Scacca.
A Dedicated Log Volume (DLV) is a specialized storage volume designed to house database transaction logs separately from the volume containing the database tables. We performed a standard benchmarking test using the sysbench tool to compare the performance of a DLV instance vs a standard RDS MySQL instance, as shared in the following section.
In this comparison of Redis vs Memcached, we strip away the complexity, focusing on each in-memory data store’s performance, scalability, and unique features. Redis Data Types and Structures The design of Redis’s data structures emphasizes versatility. Memcached’s primary strength lies in its simplicity.
It’s less of an apples-to-oranges comparison and more like apples-to-orange-sherbet. Why RPC is “faster” It’s tempting to simply write a micro-benchmark test where we issue 1000 requests to a server over HTTP and then repeat the same test with asynchronous messages. But the answer isn’t that simple. Messaging doesn’t do that.
HammerDB uses stored procedures to achieve maximum throughput when benchmarking your database. HammerDB has always used stored procedures as a design decision because the original benchmark was implemented as close as possible to the example workload in the TPC-C specification that uses stored procedures.
While many of us, designers and developers, are likely to have a relatively new mobile phone in our pockets, a vast majority of our customers isn’t quite like us. A performance benchmark Lighthouse is well-known. And to ensure the quality of a product, we always need to test — on a number of devices, and in a number of conditions.
These updates are designed to keep databases running at peak performance and simplify database operations. Please note that the focus of these tests was around standard metrics gathering and display, we’ll use a future blog post to benchmark some of the more intensive query analytics (QAN) performance numbers.
HammerDB is a software application for database benchmarking. Databases are highly sophisticated software, and to design and run a fair benchmark workload is a complex undertaking. However, although these results are the gold standard of database benchmarking to do so, requires time, expertise and not insignificant cost.
Benchmark your site against your competitors Our public-facing Industry Benchmarks dashboard gets a lot of visits, but did you know you can create your own custom competitive benchmarking dashboard in SpeedCurve? READ : How to create a competitive benchmark dashboard ––––– 4.
Its component-based design lets you write code that renders on iOS, Android, and the web. In conclusion, HTML developers and designers are hardly used to JSX, which makes teamwork a bit of a problem for UI/UX-heavy teams. . Styled Components: to alter the design & feel of the UI components. Server-Side Rendering.
use the TPC-H benchmark to assess Redshift, Redshift Spectrum, Athena, Presto, Hive, and Vertica to find out what works best and the trade-offs involved. The design space. in the TPC-H Benchmark Standard for details of the queries). Key findings. Query restrictions. System initialisation time.
Such a design rules out an entire class of application errors, protecting private data from accidentally leaking. Although state-of-the-are databases have security features designed for exactly this purpose, such as row-level access policies and grants of views, these features are too limiting for many web applications.
As an engineer on a browser team, I'm privy to the blow-by-blow of various performance projects, benchmark fire drills, and the ways performance marketing (deeply) impacts engineering priorities. With each team, benchmarks lost are understood as bugs. For example, an area where Apple is absolutely killing it is in mobile CPU design.
Responsive Web Design (RWD) is now a well established technique yet it’s adoption is still surprisingly low. Comparison of page size and assets types across different responsive widths. Comparison of full loaded time for new Guardian responsive site (Guardian NGW) vs current Guardian site and the New York Times.
Make sure you design the data types correctly while planning for the future growth of the table. sec) Records: 0 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0 mysql> INSERT INTO employees_compressed SELECT * FROM employees; Size comparison: [user1] percona@db1: ~ $ sudo ls -lh /var/lib/mysql/employees/|grep employees -rw-r --.
Here’s some predictions I’m making: Jack Dongarra’s efforts to highlight the low efficiency of the HPCG benchmark as an issue will influence the next generation of supercomputer architectures to optimize for sparse matrix computations. In comparison, for Linpack Frontier operates at 68% of peak capacity. petaflops, which is 0.8%
For example, here is what a comparison report looks like in Rigor. Competitive & Industry Benchmarking. With a Synthetic product, benchmarking a competitor’s site is as easy as testing your own site…you simply provide a URL. Benchmarking your performance against your competitors and industries.
Well, performance comparisons aren’t so easy since the AppFabric license agreement states: “You may not disclose the results of any benchmark tests of the software to any third party without Microsoft’s prior written approval.” A Few Words on Design Philosophy: Keep It Simple. Testing Scale-Up Performance.
Design: Performance is the gap between Figma mockups and the user experience of products for many, but not all , users. The extent to which a product performs well, the higher its likelihood of behaving in accordance to the approved design spec. Consistent performance matters just as much as low average latency.
Here's how to set up ongoing competitive benchmarking and generate comparison videos. One excellent practice that's used effectively by companies like Lonely Planet and Ticketmaster is to have monitors mounted in open areas of their offices, displaying key performance stats and comparison videos.
Pointer arithmetic, loop index increments, loop trip count comparisons, and conditional branches are all essentially “free” on mainstream Xeon processors, but have to be considered very carefully on the Xeon Phi x200. 8.056 0.056 75.0% 74.48% 0.70% 2 24 3 27 13.5 7.086 0.086 85.71% 84.67% 1.22% 4 48 3 51 12.75 FMAs/cycle.
Pointer arithmetic, loop index increments, loop trip count comparisons, and conditional branches are all essentially “free” on mainstream Xeon processors, but have to be considered very carefully on the Xeon Phi x200. A “best case” scenario: DGEMM. 1 12 3 15 15 15.0156 8.0 8.056 0.056 75.0% 74.48% 0.70%. 2 24 3 27 13.5
With new innovations come new terms, designs, and algorithms. This is different from the reference count design that was used in SQL Server 7.0 and 2000.
Performance isn’t just a technical concern: it affects everything from accessibility to usability to search engine optimization, and when baking it into the workflow, design decisions have to be informed by their performance implications. Looking back now, things seem to have changed quite significantly.
Performance isn’t just a technical concern: it affects everything from accessibility to usability to search engine optimization, and when baking it into the workflow, design decisions have to be informed by their performance implications. Looking back now, things seem to have changed quite significantly. Large preview ).
In comparison, the terminal handler used only 0.47% CPU time. Upon closely examining the user’s Notebook, we noticed a library called pystan , which provides Python bindings to a native C++ library called stan, looked suspicious. Specifically, pystan uses asyncio. The profiling result is as follows: As one can see, a lot of CPU time (89%!!)
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content