Remove c
article thumbnail

Benchmark (YCSB) numbers for Redis, MongoDB, Couchbase2, Yugabyte and BangDB

High Scalability

This article is to simply report the YCSB bench test results in detail for five NoSQL databases namely Redis, MongoDB, Couchbase, Yugabyte and BangDB and compare the result side by side. I have used latest versions for each NoSQL DB and have followed the recommendations to run all the databases in optimized conditions. Load and 2.

article thumbnail

Why Tcl is 700% faster than Python for database benchmarking

HammerDB

Python is a popular programming language, especially for beginners, and consequently we see it occurring in places where it just shouldn’t be used, such as database benchmarking. We use stored procedures because, as the introductory post shows, using single SQL statements turns our database benchmark into a network test).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Why you should benchmark your database using stored procedures

HammerDB

HammerDB uses stored procedures to achieve maximum throughput when benchmarking your database. HammerDB has always used stored procedures as a design decision because the original benchmark was implemented as close as possible to the example workload in the TPC-C specification that uses stored procedures.

article thumbnail

How To Scale a Single-Host PostgreSQL Database With Citus

Percona

Rather than listing the concepts, function calls, etc, available in Citus, which frankly is a bit boring, I’m going to explore scaling out a database system starting with a single host. And now, execute the benchmark: -- execute the following on the coordinator node pgbench -c 20 -j 3 -T 60 -P 3 pgbench The results are not pretty.

Database 109
article thumbnail

HammerDB v4.11 New Features: Performance Profiles for TPROC-C Workloads

HammerDB

Arguably, the most common beginning errors with database benchmarking is for a user to select a single point of utilisation (usually overconfigured) and then extrapolate conclusions about system performance from this single point. automates this practice by introducing the concept of performance profiles for TPROC-C workloads.

C++ 52
article thumbnail

Using HammerDB in database failure and failover scenarios

HammerDB

A frequently asked question with HammerDB is when a user is using the TPROC-C workload to test database failure and failover scenarios, by deliberately killing connections or shutting down the database during a workload and then restarting it. Is a TPROC-C workload valid if you have restarted the database?

article thumbnail

Comparing HammerDB TPROC-C results with sysbench-tpcc

HammerDB

Firstly, it is worth noting that both HammerDB TPROC-C and sysbench-tpcc run workloads based on the TPC-C specification, however as described here HammerDB is called TPROC-C to correctly comply with the TPC fair use rules. All benchmarks are valuable, however it is important to ensure that you deriving accurate results.

C++ 52