This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
You might imagine that at some point we had a major scaling crises, where it looked like we'd fail due to an architectural bottleneck, and engineers worked long nights and weekends to save Netflix from certain disaster. A latency outlier issue that happened every 15 minutes. html [The PMCs of EC2]: /blog/2017-05-04/the-pmcs-of-ec2.html
My personal opinion is that I don't see a widespread need for more capacity given horizontal scaling and servers that can already exceed 1 Tbyte of DRAM; bandwidth is also helpful, but I'd be concerned about the increased latency for adding a hop to more memory. Ford, et al., “TCP
The talks are up on YouTube , including my own (behind a paywall, but the slides are freely available [1] ): The talk, like this post, is an update on network and CPU realities this series has documented since 2017. These are depressingly similar specs to devices I recommended for testing in 2017. 2023 Content Targets #. 4GiB of RAM.
Tue-Thu Apr 25-27: High-Performance and Low-Latency C++ (Stockholm). On April 25-27, I’ll be in Stockholm (Kista) giving a three-day seminar on “High-Performance and Low-Latency C++.” If you’re interested in attending, please check out the links, and I look forward to meeting and re-meeting many of you there.
TL;DR: A lot has changed since 2017 when we last estimated a global baseline resource per-page resource budget of 130-170KiB. To update our global baseline from 2017, we want to update our priors on a few dimensions: The evolved device landscape. The Moto G4 , for example. Here begins our 2021 adventure. Hard Reset.
Wondering where RabbitMQ fits into your architecture? Microservices Communication In the context of a microservices architecture that demands scalability and loose coupling among services, RabbitMQ serves as a critical component. Learn how RabbitMQ can boost your system’s efficiency and reliability in these practical scenarios.
I started writing “ Serverless Architectures ” in May 2016. Gojko Adzic has done some great speaking and writing on his experience here, and I included the link to his talk from late 2017. I also rewrote the section on Startup Latency since Cold Starts are one of the big “FUD” areas of Serverless.
Considerations for setting the architectural foundations for a fast data platform. Google was among the pioneers that created “web scale” architectures to analyze the massive data sets that resulted from “crawling” the web that gave birth to Apache Hadoop, MapReduce, and NoSQL databases. Back in the days of Web 1.0,
They understood that most websites lack tight latency budgeting, dedicated performance teams, hawkish management reviews, ship gates to prevent regressions, and end-to-end measurements of critical user journeys. It finally provides an effortless, objective quality measurement prospective customers can use to assess frontend architectures.
My personal opinion is that I don't see a widespread need for more capacity given horizontal scaling and servers that can already exceed 1 Tbyte of DRAM; bandwidth is also helpful, but I'd be concerned about the increased latency for adding a hop to more memory. Ford, et al., “TCP
Put another way, the performance gap between what devices the wealthy carry and what budget shoppers carry grew more this year (252 points) than the year-over-year gains from process and architecture at the volume price point (174 points). So what did $650, give or take, buy in late 2017 or early 2018? That's where the good news ends.
— Alex Russell (@slightlylate) October 4, 2017. One distinct trend is a belief that a JavaScript framework and Single-Page Architecture (SPA) is a must for PWA development. It simulates a link with a 400ms RTT and 400-600Kbps of throughput (plus latency variability and simulated packet loss). Maybe "ambush by JS"?
A peculiar throughput limitation on Intel’s Xeon Phi x200 (Knights Landing) Introduction: In December 2017, my colleague Damon McDougall (now at AMD) asked for help in porting the fused multiply-add example code from a Colfax report ( [link] ) to the Xeon Phi x200 (Knights Landing) processors here at TACC.
Introduction: In December 2017, my colleague Damon McDougall (now at AMD) asked for help in porting the fused multiply-add example code from a Colfax report ( [link] ) to the Xeon Phi x200 (Knights Landing) processors here at TACC. simple addition instead of FMA) or with fewer registers and shorter pipeline latency (e.g,
Delta Air Lines experienced a severe system outage in 2017, resulting in flight cancellations and delays across their network. Proactive monitoring aids in detecting performance bottlenecks, latency difficulties, and other anomalies that may influence availability.
Delta Air Lines experienced a severe system outage in 2017, resulting in flight cancellations and delays across their network. Proactive monitoring aids in detecting performance bottlenecks, latency difficulties, and other anomalies that may influence availability.
Using this approach, we observed latencies ranging from 1 to 10 seconds, averaging 7.4 This file was introduced in this commit in 2017, with the purpose of improving the performance of user programs that determine aggregate memory statistics. The input to stdin is sent to the backend (i.e., We then exported the .har
Estimated Input Latency tells us if we are hitting that threshold, and ideally, it should be below 50ms. Keeping progressive enhancement as the guiding principle of your front-end architecture and deployment is a safe bet. Consider using PRPL pattern and app shell architecture. Use progressive enhancement as a default.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content