This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
I believe that all optimizing C/C++ compilers know how to pull this trick and it is generally beneficial irrespective of the processor’s architecture. I make my benchmarking code available. The idea is not novel and goes back to at least 1973 (Jacobsohn). What if d is a constant, but not known to the compiler? Can we do better?
The example below is for a 2005-era processor with 60 ns memory latency and 6.4 cache lines per core Available L1 cache miss concurrency: 10 cache lines per core 2023 processor: Xeon Max 9480, 56-core, “Sapphire Rapids” 307.2 cache lines -> 5.6 GB/s * 107 ns = 32870 Bytes -> 513 cache lines -> 9.2
At Netflix, we've been using these technologies as they've been made available for instance types in the AWS EC2 cloud. It's amazing to recall that it was even possible to virtualize x86 before processors had hardware-assisted virtualization (Intel VT-x and AMD-V), which were added in 2005 and 2006. Nitro's performance is near-metal.
There are a myriad of options available when choosing which backend framework you want to work with. Laravel follows the MVC architectural pattern and was built to facilitate extensive backend development. Furthermore, it’s easy to build a robust API with the help of various HTTP utility methods and middleware available.
The presentation discusses a family of simple performance models that I developed over the last 20 years — originally in support of processor and system design at SGI (1996-1999), IBM (1999-2005), and AMD (2006-2008), but more recently in support of system procurements at The Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC) (2009-present).
It can also take advantage of the elastic computing resources available in cloud infrastructures to quickly and cost-effectively scale throughput to meet changes in demand. They transparently distribute stored objects across the cluster’s servers and ensure that data is not lost if a server or network component fails.
It can also take advantage of the elastic computing resources available in cloud infrastructures to quickly and cost-effectively scale throughput to meet changes in demand. They transparently distribute stored objects across the cluster’s servers and ensure that data is not lost if a server or network component fails.
This approach can be expressed in more formal way by the following equation: where is the data available for analysis, is the space of a retailer’s actions and decisions, is an econometric model defined as a function of actions and data, and is the optimal strategy. This framework resembles the approach suggested in [JK98].
The presentation discusses a family of simple performance models that I developed over the last 20 years — originally in support of processor and system design at SGI (1996-1999), IBM (1999-2005), and AMD (2006-2008), but more recently in support of system procurements at The Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC) (2009-present).
For example, Akamai introduced ASI in 2005, which became the standard for building new websites. Specialized featuresSome vendors offer specialized features that are not available in competing CDNs. Akamai tried to convince many users to use this new framework. â€â€Is Vendor Lock-in a Bad Thing?
The example below is for a 2005-era processor with 60 ns memory latency and 6.4 cache lines per core Available L1 cache miss concurrency: 10 cache lines per core 2023 processor: Xeon Max 9480, 56-core, “Sapphire Rapids” 307.2 cache lines -> 5.6 GB/s * 107 ns = 32870 Bytes -> 513 cache lines -> 9.2
At Netflix, we've been using these technologies as they've been made available for instance types in the AWS EC2 cloud. It's amazing to recall that it was even possible to virtualize x86 before processors had hardware-assisted virtualization (Intel VT-x and AMD-V), which were added in 2005 and 2006. Nitro's performance is near-metal.
So, when businesses integrate these exclusive features into their applications, they become tied to the vendor, as replicating these features in another CDN is impossible.For example, Akamai introduced ASI in 2005, which became the standard for building new websites. Akamai tried to convince many users to use this new framework.
As the internet grew, the amount of information available to consumers became so vast that it outran traditional human means of curation and selection. In 2005, in “ What is Web 2.0? ,” I made the case that the companies that had survived the dotcom bust had all in one way or another become experts at “harnessing collective intelligence.”
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content